|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EU Kommissær Frits Bolkesteins tale om blandt andet "Fællesskabspatentet" og sammenhængen med EPO = European Patent Office i Munchen og EU. "Der ligger en hund begravet her! I EPO!"- My comment! Anne -------------- Mr Frits Bolkestein Member of the European Commission in charge of the Internal Market Protection of intellectual property rights in the European Union Address to Irish Exporters' Association Dublin, 29 May 2001 "klip" Patents At the European Council in Lisbon in early Spring 2000, the Heads of States and Governments said that it was necessary to create a new instrument for patent protection which would meet the highly legitimate requests from industry. In August last year, the Commission presented a proposal for a unitary Community patent system. The Commission proposal is ambitious and aims at creating a Community-wide patent protection which is simple, efficient and cheap and which creates legal certainty. The Community patent will have a key role in stimulating research and innovation in the Union and in boosting European competitiveness. The Community patent will have the same features as the Community trade mark and the Community design; through an application, protection will be provided for the whole Community. The Community patent must be affordable; this is to be achieved essentially through reduced translation requirements. There must be legal certainty; to this end it is proposed that litigation will be conducted before a centralised Community jurisdiction. The Community patent will be governed both by the proposed regulation and the Munich Convention on European patents. In order to avoid having two sets of potentially divergent rules for Europe-wide patents (the European patents and the Community Patent), the Commission proposal builds on the successful acquis of the Munich system. Thus the Community patent would be granted by the European Patent Office and subjected to the provisions of the European Patent Convention up to the grant. The Community-wide effects of the Community patent after the grant would be determined by the Regulation. The existence of National Patent Offices should not be put at risk with the introduction of the Community Patent. However, the introduction of the Community Patent may require a profound re-evaluation of the role of these offices. This dossier is complex and a number of issues remain to be resolved if the patent is to be in place as urged by the Lisbon and Stockholm summits. The Commission is devoting much time and energy to ensuring that this can happen. I hope that the political will to make progress exists and that there will be a constructive debate at the Internal Market Council on 31 May. Support for Ireland for this important project is therefore most welcome. http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start/cgi/guesten.ksh?p_action.gettxt=gt&doc=SPEE CH/01/247|0|RAPID&lg=EN Anne -- Anne Østergaard, sslug@sslug http://www.sslug.dk
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||